On Thursday, March 10, 2016 07:56:41 AM Dave Airlie wrote:
> On 9 March 2016 at 23:19, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 7:14 AM, Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> From: Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> Windows 10 seems to have standardised power control for the
> >> optimus/powerxpress laptops using PR3 power resource hooks.
> >>
> >> I'm not sure this is definitely the correct place to be
> >> doing this, but it works for me here.
> >>
> >> The ACPI device for the GPU I have is \_SB_.PCI0.PEG_.VID_
> >> but the power resource hooks are on \_SB_.PCI0.PEG_, so
> >> this patch creates a new power domain to turn the GPU
> >> device parent off using standard ACPI calls.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/gpu/vga/vga_switcheroo.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >> include/linux/vga_switcheroo.h | 3 ++-
> >> 2 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/vga/vga_switcheroo.c b/drivers/gpu/vga/vga_switcheroo.c
> >> index 665ab9f..be32cb2 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/vga/vga_switcheroo.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/vga/vga_switcheroo.c
> >> @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@
> >> #include <linux/uaccess.h>
> >> #include <linux/vgaarb.h>
> >> #include <linux/vga_switcheroo.h>
> >> -
> >> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
> >> /**
> >> * DOC: Overview
> >> *
> >> @@ -997,3 +997,55 @@ vga_switcheroo_init_domain_pm_optimus_hdmi_audio(struct device *dev,
> >> return -EINVAL;
> >> }
> >> EXPORT_SYMBOL(vga_switcheroo_init_domain_pm_optimus_hdmi_audio);
> >> +
> >> +/* With Windows 10 the runtime suspend/resume can use power
> >> + resources on the parent device */
> >> +static int vga_acpi_switcheroo_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
> >> +{
> >> + struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> >> + int ret;
> >> + struct acpi_device *adev;
> >> +
> >> + ret = dev->bus->pm->runtime_suspend(dev);
> >> + if (ret)
> >> + return ret;
> >> +
> >> + ret = acpi_bus_get_device(ACPI_HANDLE(&pdev->dev), &adev);
> >
> > You can use ACPI_COMPANION(&pdev->dev) for that.
> >
> >> + if (!ret)
> >> + acpi_device_set_power(adev->parent, ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD);
> >
> > Won't that mess up with the PM of the parent? Or do we know that the
> > parent won't do its own PM?
>
> The parent is always going to be pcieport.
I see.
> It doesn't seem to do any runtime PM,
> I do wonder if pcieport should be doing it's own runtime PM handling,
> but that is a
> larger task than I'm thinking to tackle here.
PCIe ports don't do PM - yet. Mika has posted a series of patches to implement
that, however, that are waiting for comments now:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8453311/
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8453381/
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8453391/
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8453411/
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8453371/
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8453351/
> Maybe I should be doing
>
> pci_set_power_state(pdev->bus->self, PCI_D3cold) ? I'm not really sure.
Using pci_set_power_state() would be more appropriate IMO, but you can get
to the bridge via dev->parent too, can't you?
In any case, it looks like you and Mika need to talk. :-)
> I'm guessing on Windows this all happens automatically.
PCIe ports are power-managend by (newer) Windows AFAICS, but we know for a fact
that this simply doesn't work reliably on some older hardware which is why
we don't do that. I suppose that the Windows in question uses a cut-off date
or similar to decide what do do with PCIe ports PM.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
