On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 04:54:28PM -0500, Jeff Moyer wrote: > Jerry Hoemann <jerry.hoemann@xxxxxxx> writes: > > > + uuid = pkg->h.dsm_uuid; > > + rev = pkg->h.dsm_rev ? pkg->h.dsm_rev : 1; > > Shouldn't revision id be required? > Yes it should be. Good catch. I was testing use of reclaiming previously unused members of the structure. I should have removed this line. And this reminds me that I should also add a test that the reserved fields of ndn_pkg are actually zero. I'll address both in version 2. thanks -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jerry Hoemann Software Engineer Hewlett-Packard Enterprise ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
