On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 4:44 PM, Jerry Hoemann <jerry.hoemann@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 03:26:38PM -0500, Jeff Moyer wrote: [..] >> I see. I misread that, because you didn't actually make buf a zero >> length array (see the structure definition quoted above). I guess you >> meant to write this: >> >> unsigned char buf[0]; >> > > The ndn_pkg.buf struct uses a flexible array definition. This is in C99. > An explicit zero length array is a gcc extension that has been around much > longer. They behave in a similar fashion, but aren't identical. In my > limited use they behave the same. "buf[0]" is more idiomatic for Linux. I know I expressed concern about compiler compatibility for ACPICA, but this path does not have ACPICA interactions. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
