> Is your concern readibility or size of generated code (or both?)
>
> I'll look to consolidating the debug printing in next version as additional patch.
Just a minor style comment, not critical.
> If we had a longer list, I would definitely say yes. Not so sure with
> just two types. I'll take a look for the next version.
The same, just a style comment.
> list_for_each_entry(nvdimm_bus, &nvdimm_bus_list, list) {
> - if (nvdimm_bus->id == id) {
> + if (nvdimm_bus->id != id)
I noticed another minor issue. You have switched from "==" to "!="
here, but you didn't add "break" after ioctl is handled for the found
bus.
Thanks,
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
