On Thu Oct 22 00:39, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Dustin Byford > <dustin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed Oct 21 12:08, Mika Westerberg wrote: > >> I don't really have strong feelings whether it should be the I2C core or > >> individual drivers setting the ACPI companion. However, it would be nice > >> to match DT here and they assign their of_node per driver. > > > > OK with me, if we can convince Rafael this is a good idea, I'll send a > > new revision with drivers setting the companion. > > If you can guarantee that ACPI PM or anything like _DS or _SRS will > never be invoked for the device objects that "inherit" the ACPI > companion from their parent, it at least is not outright dangerous. I'm hoping an ack from Mika will suffice, but please let me know if there's something I can do to verify or help ensure this. --Dustin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
