Hi, On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Dustin Byford <dustin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed Oct 21 12:08, Mika Westerberg wrote: >> I don't really have strong feelings whether it should be the I2C core or >> individual drivers setting the ACPI companion. However, it would be nice >> to match DT here and they assign their of_node per driver. > > OK with me, if we can convince Rafael this is a good idea, I'll send a > new revision with drivers setting the companion. If you can guarantee that ACPI PM or anything like _DS or _SRS will never be invoked for the device objects that "inherit" the ACPI companion from their parent, it at least is not outright dangerous. That said I'm thinking that may need some more sophisticated approach here, so we really can guarantee certain things, but that's for the future. Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
