On Thu, 2015-10-15 at 19:32 +0000, Moore, Robert wrote: > if you started to use "const" for some methods you usually forced to > use this in most of your code. But the time spent for maintaining > (typing, recompiling when some const is missing, etc.) of > const-correctness in code seems greater than for fixing of possible > (very rare) problems caused by not using of const-correctness at all c is not c++. "seems" is a dubious statement. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
