Sorry for top posting. Can you summarize the OperationRegion issue? I am aware of a few early firmwares that effectively had the producer/consumer type for bridge resources the wrong way around but not of the specific issue. If ASWG confidential I can take it over there. -- Computer Architect | Sent from my 64-bit #ARM Powered phone > On Oct 15, 2015, at 19:43, Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On 10/16/2015 03:15 AM, Jon Masters wrote: >> Hi Hanjun, >> >> Thanks for your hard work on ARM64 PCI host bridge/root complex so far! >> >>> On 05/26/2015 08:49 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote: >>> This patch set is introducing ARM64 PCI hostbridge init based on ACPI, >>> which based on Jiang Liu's patch set "Consolidate ACPI PCI root common >>> code into ACPI core": >>> >>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/5/14/98 >> >> The latest version (v7) of the ACPI PCI root common code consolidation >> series was posted by Gerry (Jiang Liu) yesterday: >> >> https://lkml.kernel.org/g/1444804182-6596-1-git-send-email-jiang.liu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> >> This got me wondering what the status is of the ARM64 specific >> hostbridge patch series that has a dependency upon the former. Are you >> planning to wait for that series to be accepted or post a newer rebased >> version for additional review, or something else? > > Tomasz and Lorenzo are discussing about the PCI config based > OperationRegions, which still have no conclusion yet, Lorenzo > started a discussion on ASWG and hope can get some feedback. > > Other than that, Tomasz volunteered to cleanup this patch set, I > think we need to rebase on Jiang's v7 patchset which was accepted > By Rafael, of course I will work with Tomasz to prepare those > patches. > > Thanks > Hanjun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
