Hi, > From: Chen, Yu C > Sent: Friday, October 09, 2015 5:50 PM > > Hi, LV > > > From: Zheng, Lv > > Sent: Friday, October 09, 2015 4:33 PM > > > > Hi, Yu > > > > > From: Chen, Yu C > > > Sent: Friday, October 09, 2015 4:20 PM > > > > > > > > > acpi_status acpi_os_remove_interrupt_handler(u32 irq, > > > acpi_osd_handler handler) > > > > Why don't you rename irq here to gsi to improve the readability? > > The false naming and the wrong example written for this function are > > probably the root causes of all other bad code. > > So if we want to stop people making future mistakes, we need to cleanup > > ourselves. > > > OK, will rewrite in next version. You can add Acked-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@xxxxxxxxx> And don't forget to mark it as a stable material. One more question is: Do you want the modules to use "acpi_sci_irq"? If the answer is no, then please ignore this question. Thanks and best regards -Lv > > > Thanks and best regards > > -Lv > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html