Hi Sudeep, On 4 August 2015 at 13:00, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On 04/08/15 16:44, Ashwin Chaugule wrote: >> On 4 August 2015 at 11:18, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> Bisectability aside, without the idle changes to decouple it from >> ACPI_PROCESSOR, the CPPC code will be non-functional. CPPC code has >> been around for review publicly for almost a year and we need it to be >> mainlined soon. So, given that we've converged on a solution for new >> Kconfigs for Idle and PSS and that they're separate patches, why not >> let it progress forwards as part of this series? >> > Sorry, I didn't mean to block this series in anyway. I was just thinking > on how to post the preparatory changes to introduce _LPI. I prefer to > base it on mainline rather than this patch series and hence I made that > request. > Can you please try rebasing with Patch 2,3,6 and 9 of the V8 series? Those should get you going for your LPI work. Thanks, Ashwin. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
