On 09/07/15 19:04, Ashwin Chaugule wrote:
This patch introduces a new Kconfig symbol, ACPI_PROCESSOR_IDLE, which is auto selected by architectures which support the ACPI based C states for CPU Idle management. The processor_idle driver in its present form contains declarations specific to X86 and IA64. Since there are no reasonable defaults for other architectures e.g. ARM64, the driver is selected only by the arch/x86/Kconfig. This helps in decoupling the ACPI processor_driver from the ACPI processor_idle driver which is useful for the upcoming alternative patchwork for controlling CPU Performance (CPPC) and CPU Idle (LPI). Signed-off-by: Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@xxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/acpi/Kconfig | 6 +++++- drivers/acpi/Makefile | 3 ++- include/acpi/processor.h | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig index 00748dc..8a60b6e 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig @@ -177,9 +177,13 @@ config ACPI_CPU_FREQ_PSS monitoring. It is required by several flavors of cpufreq performance-state drivers. +config ACPI_PROCESSOR_IDLE + def_bool y + depends on X86 || IA64 +
In general, you need to split this series so that initially few patches deal with all the existing Kconfig fix-ups and then introduce PCC/PSS/CPPC related stuffs. That would help me rebase and test _LPI support. Regards, Sudeep -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
