Hi Ashwin, On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 10:28 PM, Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 8 July 2015 at 16:05, Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 8 July 2015 at 15:55, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Hi Ashwin, >>> >>> On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 9:16 PM, Ashwin Chaugule >>> <ashwin.chaugule@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> Hi Rafael, >>>> [cut] >>> >>> Also I'm still unsure what the connection between _CST and CPPC is. >>> >> >> There isnt. But I'm missing where I've implied the dependency? > > Perhaps the confusion is coming from the introduction of ACPI_CST in > this file. I could leave it as it is and just separate out the > ACPI_PSS bits. But I figured, while I'm at it, I'd introduce ACPI_CST, > since we know the LPI stuff is coming up soon as a CST alternative > anyway. So if you prefer, I can drop the CST bits and maybe Sudeep can > address that as part of his LPI patchset? Yes, please. That would be much less confusing. Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
