Re: [PATCH 2/2] Documentation / ACPI: fix a typo, s/objecte/object/

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 12:17:23AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 29, 2015 10:37:25 AM Antonio Ospite wrote:
> > Also add some commas to make it clear that the word "object" refers to
> > "configuration" and not to "names".
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Antonio Ospite <ao2@xxxxxx>
> > Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Len Brown <lenb@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > ---
> >  Documentation/acpi/gpio-properties.txt | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/acpi/gpio-properties.txt b/Documentation/acpi/gpio-properties.txt
> > index ae36fcf..cd4b6c7 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/acpi/gpio-properties.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/acpi/gpio-properties.txt
> > @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
> >  _DSD Device Properties Related to GPIO
> >  --------------------------------------
> >  
> > -With the release of ACPI 5.1 and the _DSD configuration objecte names
> > +With the release of ACPI 5.1, and the _DSD configuration object, names
> >  can finally be given to GPIOs (and other things as well) returned by
> >  _CRS.  Previously, we were only able to use an integer index to find
> >  the corresponding GPIO, which is pretty error prone (it depends on
> 
> This still doesn't read too well IMO.  Below is my version of the fix.
> 
> ---
>  Documentation/acpi/gpio-properties.txt |    6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: linux-pm/Documentation/acpi/gpio-properties.txt
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/Documentation/acpi/gpio-properties.txt
> +++ linux-pm/Documentation/acpi/gpio-properties.txt
> @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
>  _DSD Device Properties Related to GPIO
>  --------------------------------------
>  
> -With the release of ACPI 5.1 and the _DSD configuration objecte names
> -can finally be given to GPIOs (and other things as well) returned by
> -_CRS.  Previously, we were only able to use an integer index to find
> +With the release of ACPI 5.1, the _DSD configuration object finally
> +allows names to be given to GPIOs (and other things as well) returned
> +by _CRS.  Previously, we were only able to use an integer index to find
>  the corresponding GPIO, which is pretty error prone (it depends on
>  the _CRS output ordering, for example).

Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux