On Fri, 01 May 2015 00:17:23 +0200 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wednesday, April 29, 2015 10:37:25 AM Antonio Ospite wrote: [...] > This still doesn't read too well IMO. Below is my version of the fix. > > --- > Documentation/acpi/gpio-properties.txt | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > Index: linux-pm/Documentation/acpi/gpio-properties.txt > =================================================================== > --- linux-pm.orig/Documentation/acpi/gpio-properties.txt > +++ linux-pm/Documentation/acpi/gpio-properties.txt > @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@ > _DSD Device Properties Related to GPIO > -------------------------------------- > > -With the release of ACPI 5.1 and the _DSD configuration objecte names > -can finally be given to GPIOs (and other things as well) returned by > -_CRS. Previously, we were only able to use an integer index to find > +With the release of ACPI 5.1, the _DSD configuration object finally > +allows names to be given to GPIOs (and other things as well) returned > +by _CRS. Previously, we were only able to use an integer index to find > the corresponding GPIO, which is pretty error prone (it depends on > the _CRS output ordering, for example). > This is fine by me Rafael. Feel free to drop my 2/2 and add your version with ACK. Acked-by: Antonio Ospite <ao2@xxxxxx> Thanks, Antonio -- Antonio Ospite http://ao2.it A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
