On 2015年04月30日 21:50, Will Deacon wrote:
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 02:47:13PM +0100, Hanjun Guo wrote:
On 2015年04月29日 22:42, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 09:31:03AM -0500, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
On 04/29/2015 09:04 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 08:44:08AM -0500, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
Any plans for ACPI on 32-bit ARM?
Not that I am aware, but I could be totally wrong. The reason I am adding
this here for 32-bit ARM is because the ACPI spec mentioned this.
If you think this is not necessary until we introduce ACPI for ARM32, it can
be removed.
I think it should be removed (as long as ACPI cannot be selected on
arm32).
I agree.
Now there is no plan for ARM32 ACPI as I know, ACPI for ARM targets
for ARM64 based enterprise system at now.
While we're at it, do we *really* need to support CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS_POWER
on arm64? It's a deprecated /proc/acpi interface and it would be nice to
avoid introducing deprecated behaviour if we can avoid it.
I agree. It is used for laptop ac adapter and battery, I will look
into that and clean it up for ARM64.
Thanks
Hanjun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
