On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 09:31:03AM -0500, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote: > > > On 04/29/2015 09:04 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote: > >On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 08:44:08AM -0500, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote: > >> From ACPIv6 (http://www.uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/ACPI_6.0.pdf), > >>section 6.2.17 _CCA states that ARM platforms require ACPI _CCA object to be > >>specified for DMA-cabpable devices. This patch introduces ACPI_MUST_HAVE_CCA > >>in arm and arm64 Kconfig to specify such requirement. > >> > >>Note that when _CCA is required, if it is missing in the DSDT. ACPI driver > >>will default to setting up devices as non-coherent. > >> > >>Signed-off-by: Mark Salter <msalter@xxxxxxxxxx> > >>Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@xxxxxxx> > >>--- > >> arch/arm/Kconfig | 1 + > >> arch/arm64/Kconfig | 1 + > >> drivers/acpi/Kconfig | 3 +++ > >> 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+) > >> > >>diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig > >>index 45df48b..2a0d036 100644 > >>--- a/arch/arm/Kconfig > >>+++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig > >>@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@ > >> config ARM > >> bool > >> default y > >>+ select ACPI_MUST_HAVE_CCA if ACPI > >> select ARCH_HAS_ATOMIC64_DEC_IF_POSITIVE > >> select ARCH_HAS_ELF_RANDOMIZE > >> select ARCH_HAS_TICK_BROADCAST if GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS_BROADCAST > > > >Any plans for ACPI on 32-bit ARM? > > Not that I am aware, but I could be totally wrong. The reason I am adding > this here for 32-bit ARM is because the ACPI spec mentioned this. > > If you think this is not necessary until we introduce ACPI for ARM32, it can > be removed. I think it should be removed (as long as ACPI cannot be selected on arm32). -- Catalin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html