On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 04:05:11PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx> > > Introduce data structures and code allowing "built-in" properties > to be associated with devices in such a way that they will be used > by the device_property_* API if no proper firmware node (neither DT > nor ACPI) is present for the given device. > > Each property is to be represented by a property_entry structure. > An array of property_entry structures (terminated with a null > entry) can be pointed to by the properties field of struct > property_set that can be added as a firmware node to a struct > device using device_add_property_set(). That will cause the > device_property_* API to use that property_set as the source > of properties if the given device does not have a DT node or > an ACPI companion device object associated with it. > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx> > Tested-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > > Greg, any objections? Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html