On Saturday, March 28, 2015 02:05:19 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Hi, > > Patches [1-2/3] add support for properties provided in a "pdata way" > roughly along the lines of the Heikki's patch at > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/5709461/ > > but using the fwnode field in struct device introduced by one of my > previous patches (currently in linux-next). > > Patch [3/3] does one more interesting thing on top of that, but is mostly > for discussion. Namely, it changes the behavior of the unified device > properties API to fall back to the "built-in" properties when it cannot > find the requested data in the stuff provided by the platform firmware. > > Currently, that patch would introduce an artificial difference between ACPI > and DT, because DT uses the of_node pointer in struct device won't use the > set_primary_fwnode() thing introduced buy the [1/3]. However, I have an > idea about how that can be worked around, but more on that in the changelog > of patch [3/3]. So to make some progress here I'd like to apply patches [1-2/3] (which I'm going to resend shortly) if there are no objections. Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
