On 2015年03月24日 02:32, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Sat, 21 Mar 2015, Hanjun Guo wrote:
+CC Parth Dixit, Stefano Stabellini.
On 2015年03月21日 02:54, Will Deacon wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 04:09:33AM +0000, Hanjun Guo wrote:
On 2015/3/19 3:05, Will Deacon wrote:
If you can get that in place, I'm not opposed to putting this into
linux-next ahead of the firmware summit in San Jose next week. Note that
this is not a commitment for 4.1, since I'm keen to see the outcomes of
next week before setting anything in stone.
OK, I will stick to this mailing list and respond as soon as I can.
This doesn't even build for me:
$ make ARCH=arm64 CROSS_COMPILE=aarch64-none-linux-gnu- allmodconfig
$ make ARCH=arm64 CROSS_COMPILE=aarch64-none-linux-gnu- Image
[...]
In file included from drivers/xen/acpi.c:33:0:
Sorry, I didn't build ACPI with XEN enabled on ARM64.
include/xen/acpi.h: In function ‘xen_acpi_sleep_register’:
include/xen/acpi.h:102:3: error: ‘acpi_suspend_lowlevel’ undeclared (first
use in this function)
acpi_suspend_lowlevel = xen_acpi_suspend_lowlevel;
acpi_suspend_lowlevel is defined only for X86 and IA64 for now.
^
include/xen/acpi.h:102:3: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only
once for each function it appears in
drivers/xen/acpi.c: In function ‘xen_acpi_notify_hypervisor_state’:
drivers/xen/acpi.c:61:2: error: implicit declaration of function
‘HYPERVISOR_dom0_op’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
HYPERVISOR_dom0_op(&op);
And this is only for x86:
./arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypercall.h:HYPERVISOR_dom0_op(struct
xen_platform_op *platform_op)
^
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
make[2]: *** [drivers/xen/acpi.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
make[1]: *** [drivers/xen] Error 2
make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
make: *** [drivers] Error 2
Am I missing some other patches?
No, you miss nothing. Parth Dixit is still working on XEN ACPI for
ARM64, before it's in full function, how about introduce a Kconfig
CONFIG_XEN_ACPI and let it depends on x86? when XEN ACPI for ARM64
comes, we can enable ARM64 for CONFIG_XEN_ACPI and fix the problems
above.
Stefano, Parth, what do you think?
To be precise, Parth is working on ACPI enablement for the Xen
hypervisor at the moment (on the Xen tree), I don't think he has any
patches for Linux (Dom0 is the key use case). The two works could be
carried on in parallel, even though you would obviously need Parth's Xen
patches to test the Linux side.
Sure, I saw a workaround patch for the Linux side, if Parth need
any help for the further development, I will be there.
That said, I am OK with disabling ACPI for Xen on ARM and ARM64 for now
-- I wouldn't want to cause any significant delays to your patch series.
Thanks!
Hanjun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
