On 2015/3/19 3:05, Will Deacon wrote: > Hanjun, Hi Will, > > On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 12:39:26PM +0000, Hanjun Guo wrote: >> This patch set already tested on multi platforms: >> - AMD Seattle board; >> - Cavium Thunder board; >> - Huawei D02 board; >> - Qualcomm ARM64 platform >> >> This version 10 patch set address some minor comments and collect ACKs and >> Reviewed-bys for v9: >> >> - new Acks from Rafael, Olof, Grant, Lorenzo >> - new way to handle typdef phys_cpuid_t which suggested by Rafael, >> but no functional change >> - Remove if(!phys) for early ioremappings >> - Rework sleep function for ARM64 >> - Introduce linux/acpi_irq.h to hold acpi_irq_init() >> - Disable ACPI if not HW_REDUCED_ACPI compliant >> - Remove the doc of why ACPI on ARM > So I've had a look at the current state of this series and I think there > are a few immediate things left to do: > > (1) Resolve the acpi=force cmdline issue highlighted by Lorenzo and > Catalin Sure, it will be done after the confirmation with Ard. > > (2) I believe Sudeep and Lorenzo have concerns about patch 13 (SMP init), > so I'm assuming there will be additional patches from them that are > required. Sorry, I assume that it is about the print information for PSCI absent for SMP init, right? > > (3) I have an open comment about moving the IRQ domain code into the > core, which I'd like to see addressed. I replied your email, please share your ideas for what I said. > > (4) We need an ack from Daniel on the arch-timer patch OK, thanks for your ping to Daniel :) > > If you can get that in place, I'm not opposed to putting this into > linux-next ahead of the firmware summit in San Jose next week. Note that > this is not a commitment for 4.1, since I'm keen to see the outcomes of > next week before setting anything in stone. OK, I will stick to this mailing list and respond as soon as I can. > > Also, there's no need to repost patches if you're just adding Acks. I > think I'm up to speed with those on my local branch and the Tested-by > party is starting to look a little silly. Should I send another version, and add some incremental cleanup/fix patches on top of that? Thanks Hanjun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
