On 03/17/2015 12:10 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote: > On 2015/3/17 11:23, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> On Tuesday, March 17, 2015 10:36:47 AM Hanjun Guo wrote: >> Well, almost. There is one problem with that, becuase sleep.c contains code >> outside of the ACPI_SLEEP-dependent blocks. That code is used for powering >> off ACPI platforms. >> >> I guess you don't want that code on ARM too, right? > > Yes, you are right. >> Perhaps we can use ACPI_REDUCED_HARDWARE_ONLY for that? ARM64 will be the > > Sorry, I can't fully understand your intention here, could you please > explain it more? > > Let me guess a little bit. Do you mean use ACPI_REDUCED_HARDWARE_ONLY for > powering off ACPI platforms? if so, I guess it's not a good idea, ACPI spec > only says that S4BIOS is not supported on HW-reduced ACPI platforms, S5 > has no such limitation, if I miss something here, please let me know. If helpful to the discussion, current SBBR (Server Base Boot Requirements[0]) design guidance is that for power off itself, we will prefer calling an EFI Runtime Service (that will preferentially call an PSCI - ARM Power State Coordination Interface - Secure Monitor Call (SMC - think SMI-like) internally to perform the shutdown/reboot) for the action of powering off or resetting 64-bit ARM SBBR platforms. Therefore if the alternative of an ACPI-based power off solution were not initially supported, I don't think it would have much practical impact, and it could be addressed after the initial support merged. That's just my $0.02. Jon. [0] The Server Base Boot Requirements are the platform specification we created for 64-bit ARM servers. They mandate the use of EFI and ACPI in compliant platforms: http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.den0044a/Server_Base_Boot_Requirements.pdf -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html