On 2015/3/17 10:28, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 17, 2015 09:08:45 AM Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> On 2015/3/17 7:15, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Monday, March 16, 2015 08:14:52 PM Hanjun Guo wrote:
>>>> On 2015年03月14日 05:49, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>>>> On Friday, March 13, 2015 04:14:29 PM Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> [...]
>>>>>> diff --git a/arch/ia64/Kconfig b/arch/ia64/Kconfig
>>>>>> index 074e52b..e8728d7 100644
>>>>>> --- a/arch/ia64/Kconfig
>>>>>> +++ b/arch/ia64/Kconfig
>>>>>> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ config IA64
>>>>>> select ARCH_MIGHT_HAVE_PC_SERIO
>>>>>> select PCI if (!IA64_HP_SIM)
>>>>>> select ACPI if (!IA64_HP_SIM)
>>>>>> + select ACPI_GENERIC_SLEEP if ACPI
>>>>>> select ARCH_MIGHT_HAVE_ACPI_PDC if ACPI
>>>>>> select HAVE_UNSTABLE_SCHED_CLOCK
>>>>>> select HAVE_IDE
>>>>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
>>>>>> index b7d31ca..9804431 100644
>>>>>> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
>>>>>> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
>>>>>> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ config X86_64
>>>>>> ### Arch settings
>>>>>> config X86
>>>>>> def_bool y
>>>>>> + select ACPI_GENERIC_SLEEP if ACPI
>>>>> One more nit. If you did
>>>>>
>>>>> + select ACPI_GENERIC_SLEEP if ACPI_SLEEP
>>>>>
>>>>> here (and above for ia64), you'd avoid having to make ACPI_SLEEP
>>>>> depend on ACPI_GENERIC_SLEEP which goes somewhat backwards.
>>>> In sleep.c,
>>>>
>>>> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP
>>>> acpi_target_system_state()
>>>> {
>>>> }
>>>> #endif
>>>>
>>>> and CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP depends on SUSPEND || HIBERNATION,
>>>> which one of them will be enabled on ARM64 so ACPI_SLEEP
>>>> will also enabled too.
>>>>
>>>> So if we
>>>>
>>>> +select ACPI_GENERIC_SLEEP if ACPI_SLEEP
>>>>
>>>> and
>>>>
>>>> +acpi-$(CONFIG_ACPI_GENERIC_SLEEP) += sleep.o
>>>>
>>>> it will lead to errors for acpi_target_system_state() that
>>>> is declared but not defined, so I will keep the code as
>>>> it is, what do you think?
>>> No, we need to hash this out. Having two different Kconfig options meaning
>>> almost the same thing (ACPI_SLEEP and ACPI_GENERIC_SLEEP) is beyond ugly.
>>>
>>> Do you need ACPI_SLEEP on ARM64 at all?
>> No, at least for now we don't need it, the spec for sleep is not ready for
>> ARM64 arch, so ACPI_SLEEP will not work at all on ARM64.
> Well, so what about selecting ACPI_SLEEP from the architectures that use it?
Do you mean remove CONFIG_ACPI_GENERIC_SLEEP and
+acpi-$(CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP) += sleep.o
as well (also need to remove duplicate #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP in sleep.c if
we doing so)?
Thanks
Hanjun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
