Re: Fwd: [Bug 92111] Power regression from 3.17 to 3.18 and 3.19

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday, February 11, 2015 12:48:04 AM Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 02:09:17AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> 
> > We may be able to get that feedback, but what do you suggest we do in the
> > meantime?  Nothing, I suppose?
> 
> We have the choice between increased power consumption or broken 
> Thunderbolt - either choice is going to upset somebody. My gut feeling 
> is that leaving us at increased power consumption might encourage 
> someone at Intel to try to fix things,

Fix things how exactly?

> whereas nobody at Intel is going to care about Thunderbolt hotplug.

Apple is the only party that can fix anything in Apple products as
far as I can say.

Anyway, thanks for your input!

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux