Re: Fwd: [Bug 92111] Power regression from 3.17 to 3.18 and 3.19

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 02:09:17AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

> We may be able to get that feedback, but what do you suggest we do in the
> meantime?  Nothing, I suppose?

We have the choice between increased power consumption or broken 
Thunderbolt - either choice is going to upset somebody. My gut feeling 
is that leaving us at increased power consumption might encourage 
someone at Intel to try to fix things, whereas nobody at Intel is going 
to care about Thunderbolt hotplug.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux