Re: [PATCH v8 02/21] acpi: fix acpi_os_ioremap for arm64

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 06:58:14PM +0000, Mark Salter wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-02-04 at 17:57 +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 04:08:27PM +0000, Mark Salter wrote:
> > > acpi_os_remap() is used to map ACPI tables. These tables may be in ram
> > > which are already included in the kernel's linear RAM mapping. So we
> > > need ioremap_cache to avoid two mappings to the same physical page
> > > having different caching attributes.
> > 
> > What's the call path to acpi_os_ioremap() on such tables already in the
> > linear mapping? I can see an acpi_map() function which already takes
> > care of the RAM mapping case but there are other cases where
> > acpi_os_ioremap() is called directly. For example,
> > acpi_os_read_memory(), can it be called on both RAM and I/O?
> 
> acpi_map() is the one I've seen.

By default, if should_use_kmap() is not patched for arm64, it translates
to page_is_ram(); acpi_map() would simply use a kmap() which returns the
current kernel linear mapping on arm64.

> I'm not sure about others.

Question for the ARM ACPI guys: what happens if you implement
acpi_os_ioremap() on arm64 as just ioremap()? Do you get any WARN_ON()
(__ioremap_caller() checks whether the memory is RAM)?

-- 
Catalin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux