On 2015年02月05日 04:29, Timur Tabi wrote:
On 02/02/2015 06:45 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
Hi,
This is the v8 of ACPI core patches for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1, there
are
some updates since v7:
All 21 patches:
Tested-by: Timur Tabi <timur@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi Timur, thank you very much :)
I no longer need to use "acpi=force", so that's nice.
- Add two more documantation to explain why we need ACPI in ARM64
servers
"documentation"
by Grant, and recommendations and prohibitions on the use of the
numerous
ACPI tables and objects by Al Stone.
- Add two patches which is need to map acpi tables after
acpi_gbl_permanent_mmap
is set
- Add another patch "dt / chosen: Add linux,uefi-stub-generated-dtb
property"
to address that if firmware providing no dtb, we can try ACPI
configuration data
even if no "acpi=force" is passed in early parameters. (I think
ACPI for XEN and
kexec need consider sperately as disscussed, correct me if I'm
wrong).
"need to be considered separately", "discussed"
- Add CC in the patch to the subsystem maintainers and modify the
subject
of the patch to explicitly show the subsystem touched by this
patch set,
please help us to review and ack them if they make sense, thanks.
- Add Tested-by from Qualcomm and Redhat;
- Make ACPI depends on PCI suggested by Catalin;
- Clean up SMP init function as Lorenzo suggested, remove physical
CPU hot-plug code in the patch;
- Address some comments from Marc and explicitly state that will
implment statcked irqdomain and GIC init framework when GICv3 and
"implement", "stacked"
Sorry for that, I'm not a native English speaker but I'm glad that you
you got the meaning of what I said :)
Thank you again for the test.
Hanjun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
