On Friday, January 23, 2015 08:12:06 AM Jan Beulich wrote:
> ACPI/sleep: mark acpi_sleep_dmi_check() __init
>
> This makes a difference if the compiler decides not to inline the
> function, as then the function's reference to acpisleep_dmi_table[]
> yields a section mismatch warning.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
Queued up for 3.20, thanks!
> ---
> drivers/acpi/sleep.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> --- 3.19-rc5/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
> +++ 3.19-rc5-ACPI-sleep-DMI-check-init/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
> @@ -321,7 +321,7 @@ static struct dmi_system_id acpisleep_dm
> {},
> };
>
> -static void acpi_sleep_dmi_check(void)
> +static void __init acpi_sleep_dmi_check(void)
> {
> int year;
>
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
