On Friday, January 23, 2015 12:52:39 PM Mika Westerberg wrote: > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 09:42:39AM +0200, Jarkko Nikula wrote: > > Intel Lynxpoint I2C does not have clock parameter register like SPI and UART > > do have. Therefore remove LPSS_CLK_GATE flag from the Lynxpoint I2C device > > description in order to not needlessly toggle clock enable bit in > > non-existing register. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > For linux-next branch. This has been here since commit f58b082aed43 > > ("ACPI / scan: Add special handler for Intel Lynxpoint LPSS devices") > > without known problems. > > > > Mika: I assumed this holds true for INT3432 and INT3433 too? > > Yes. > > IIRC there used to be versions of Lynxpoint where the clock was actually > gated even if the document said the register is reserved. That's why the > I2C still tries to ungate the clock. > > As long as you tested this properly, > > Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Queued up for 3.20 then, thanks! -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html