On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 11:10:32AM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
> > index 54e39e3..8268c7b 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
> > @@ -371,6 +371,31 @@ static void __init request_standard_resources(void)
> > }
> > }
> >
> > +int __init dt_scan_chosen(unsigned long node, const char *uname,
> > + int depth, void *data)
> > +{
> > + const char *p;
> > +
> > + if (depth != 1 || !data ||
> > + (strcmp(uname, "chosen") != 0 && strcmp(uname, "chosen@0") != 0))
> > + return 0;
>
> Do we ever generate chosen@0, and do we even accept that?
This probably originates from some stupid cargo-culting on my side,
based on some of the PPC-specific workarounds for old machines
remaining in drivers/of/*. It should go.
/
Leif
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
