Re: [PATCH 1/3] ACPI / processor: remove incorrect comparison of phys_id

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Rafael,

On 25/11/14 23:11, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, November 25, 2014 02:48:48 PM Sudeep Holla wrote:
phys_id in acpi_processor structure is unsigned 32-bit integer,
comparing it with signed value is incorrect.

This patch removes that incorrect comparision in
acpi_processor_hotadd_init as the lone user of this function is
already checking for correctness of phys_id before calling it.

Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx>

This one depens on commits I've dropped due to conflicts with the tip
tree.

They'll need to be rebased on top of current linux-next and resent.


I have rebased but will hold off until your response to Hanjun's concern.

I can take patches [2-3/3], though.

Thanks.

Regards,
Sudeep

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux