On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 01:22:10AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Wednesday 17 September 2014, Graeme Gregory wrote: > > It sounds like from the discussions in other threads that ARM64 should > > be following x86 and re-using DT bindings here. In which case there is > > not need to submit things to UEFI organisation. > > > > What I got a little lost in has there been a formal decision about DT > > bindings in _DSD? > > I think this is a discussion that still needs to happen: either we should > recommend everyone to use _DSD in favor of the alternatives, or we > should prohibit the use of _DSD. I have heard arguments both ways, but > hopefully we can find an easy answer. > This discussion is just not going to happen until people at @redhat.com and people who have currently announced/released hardware are actually willing to start talking about it. Id love to be able to put my foot down and ban the use of _DSD for servers but I suspect that will not happen. Graeme -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
