On Wednesday 17 September 2014, Graeme Gregory wrote: > It sounds like from the discussions in other threads that ARM64 should > be following x86 and re-using DT bindings here. In which case there is > not need to submit things to UEFI organisation. > > What I got a little lost in has there been a formal decision about DT > bindings in _DSD? I think this is a discussion that still needs to happen: either we should recommend everyone to use _DSD in favor of the alternatives, or we should prohibit the use of _DSD. I have heard arguments both ways, but hopefully we can find an easy answer. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
