Hi Lv, On 16 September 2014 00:38, Zheng, Lv <lv.zheng@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > It looks this line is still wrong: > + return ACPI_SUCCESS(status) ? -EINVAL : 0; > You may need to run a test to validate the revised patch. You're right, I should either use ACPI_FAILURE or swap -EINVAL and 0. Cheers, Ashwin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html