Hi, Ashwin > From: Ashwin Chaugule [mailto:ashwin.chaugule@xxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Sunday, September 14, 2014 6:05 AM > > Hi Mark, > > On 13 September 2014 11:57, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 09:08:08AM -0400, Ashwin Chaugule wrote: > >> On 10 September 2014 13:20, Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> How does this version look? If there are no more changes, please let > >> me know which tree this can be picked by and I can send a pull request > >> if that is preferred for this single patch. > > > > Please allow a reasonable time for review - you're nagging after two > > days, this is unreasonable for something that isn't super urgent. Two > > weeks would be more reasonable. As things stand you're adding to the > > mail volume and some people will actively delay looking at things in > > order to avoid encouraging such behaviour. > > I apologize if it seems that way. I very much appreciate the help I've > received so far. I'd sent V6 9 days ago and only Lv had feedback > around cosmetic changes. Given the simplicity of this patch and all > the previous suggestions, it seemed like we're nearly done with the > reviews. I understand your point though and look forward to seeing > this patch progress. It looks this line is still wrong: + return ACPI_SUCCESS(status) ? -EINVAL : 0; You may need to run a test to validate the revised patch. Thanks and best regards -Lv ��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{�����ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f
