Re: [Linaro-acpi] [PATCH v2 00/18] Introduce ACPI for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 07:08:59PM +0200, Alexander Spyridakis wrote:
> > Yes, I think so. If you meet any problem , please let us know, and we will
> > update the wiki.
> >
> >>
> >> Should I assume that UEFI is mandatory (alternative being the aarch64
> >> bootwrapper), as described in Documentation/arm64/arm-acpi.txt?
> >
> > Yes, UEFI is mandatory if you want to use ACPI.
> 
> Hello Hanjun,
> 
> What tables do you use for the foundation model (or AEMv8)?
> 
> The ones found in this repository:
> git://git.linaro.org/leg/acpi/acpi-asl.git are ACPIv5.0, and when the
> kernel gets pointed to them acpi is disabled because it expects an
> FADT v5.1 or later. Of course building these tables with latest ACPICA
> also fails.
> 
I updated that repository to ACPI 5.1 approximately 4 hours ago.

If you re-fetch you should see 5.1 tables for foundation model.

Graeme

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux