Re: [Linaro-acpi] [PATCH v2 00/18] Introduce ACPI for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Yes, I think so. If you meet any problem , please let us know, and we will
> update the wiki.
>
>>
>> Should I assume that UEFI is mandatory (alternative being the aarch64
>> bootwrapper), as described in Documentation/arm64/arm-acpi.txt?
>
> Yes, UEFI is mandatory if you want to use ACPI.

Hello Hanjun,

What tables do you use for the foundation model (or AEMv8)?

The ones found in this repository:
git://git.linaro.org/leg/acpi/acpi-asl.git are ACPIv5.0, and when the
kernel gets pointed to them acpi is disabled because it expects an
FADT v5.1 or later. Of course building these tables with latest ACPICA
also fails.

Regards.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux