On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 2:10 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tuesday, July 29, 2014 11:13:55 AM Vinson Lee wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 2:53 AM, William Dauchy <wdauchy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > Hi Vinson, >> > >> > On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 9:11 PM, Vinson Lee <vlee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> The warning first happens with 3.14-rc1. The warning does not occur with 3.13.0. >> > >> > Hitting the same issue here with a similar trace on 3.14.x. Did you >> > start bisecting? >> > >> > Regards, >> > -- >> > William >> >> >> I bisected the warning that I'm seeing to this commit. >> >> commit 202317a573b20d77a9abb7c16a3fd5b40cef3d9d >> Author: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx> >> Date: Fri Nov 22 21:54:37 2013 +0100 >> >> ACPI / scan: Add acpi_device objects for all device nodes in the namespace > > Interesting. > > Does the appended patch make any difference? > > Rafael > > --- > drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/core.c | 3 +-- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > Index: linux-pm/drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/core.c > =================================================================== > --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/core.c > +++ linux-pm/drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/core.c > @@ -319,8 +319,7 @@ static int __init acpi_pnp_match(struct > struct pnp_dev *pnp = _pnp; > > /* true means it matched */ > - return !acpi->physical_node_count > - && compare_pnp_id(pnp->id, acpi_device_hid(acpi)); > + return pnp->data == acpi; > } > > static struct acpi_device * __init acpi_pnp_find_companion(struct device *dev) > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Yes, with the patch on top of 3.16-rc7 I do not see the warning. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
