On Monday, July 14, 2014 09:24:16 AM Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 6:14 AM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > This *not* a regression, it is an intended behavior change [..] > > That counts as a regression. > > If things used to work, and they don't work, it's a regression. If > it's intentional, that just makes it worse. > > > Yes this may break existing configurations for some users, most likely > > users running some custom setup, who thus should be able to fix things > > by adding one more customization to there setup. > > .. and apparently this whole paragraph is completely bogus. It *does* > break things, and for normal people. That's what the bug report is all > about. So don't waffle about it. > > Bjørn, what's your setup? Is this perhaps solvable some other way? > > > TL;DR: This change really is for the better and is here to stay. > > Wrong. We don't break existing setups, and your attitude needs fixing. > > Rafael, please get it reverted, or I will have to revert it. I've queued up a revert already. I'll include it into my next pull request later this week. Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
