On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 12:21:51PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 12:21:51 +0200
> From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Chen, Gong" <gong.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx, m.chehab@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7 v4] CPER: Adjust code flow of some functions
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
>
> On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 09:59:44PM -0400, Chen, Gong wrote:
> > On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 12:11:43PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > > + TP_printk("%d %s error: %s %s %llx (mask lsb: %x), %s%s",
> > What if pa_mask_lsb not existing?
>
> Then you make it the default which says that all bits in the mask are
> invalid: -1, i.e. 255.
>
> This becomes part of the interface then, just like phys_addr is
> 0xfffff... ,i.e. -1 in the invalid case.
>
OK, fine to me. I will update it soon.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
