On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 01:30:23AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> I don't see any adverse effects of the patch below on a couple of my test
> boxes, but (a) they are Intel-based and (b) they are non-EFI, so it would be
> good to give it a go on as many machines as reasonably possible.
>
> Thanks,
> Rafael
>
> ---
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: ACPI / init: Run acpi_early_init() before efi_enter_virtual_mode()
>
> According to Matt Fleming, if acpi_early_init() was executed befpre
> efi_enter_virtual_mode(), the EFI initialization could benefit from
> it, so make that happen.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> init/main.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Index: linux-pm/init/main.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/init/main.c
> +++ linux-pm/init/main.c
> @@ -615,6 +615,7 @@ asmlinkage void __init start_kernel(void
> calibrate_delay();
> pidmap_init();
> anon_vma_init();
> + acpi_early_init();
> #ifdef CONFIG_X86
> if (efi_enabled(EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES))
> efi_enter_virtual_mode();
> @@ -641,7 +642,6 @@ asmlinkage void __init start_kernel(void
>
> check_bugs();
>
> - acpi_early_init(); /* before LAPIC and SMP init */
> sfi_init_late();
>
> if (efi_enabled(EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES)) {
>
Looks good both on kvm+OVMF and on my Dell EFI box.
Tested-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxx>
Toshi has a big EFI box though - if he could run it too, that would be
great :-)
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
