On Friday, December 20, 2013 09:50:56 PM Matt Fleming wrote: > On Fri, 20 Dec, at 01:43:38PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > > > > Possibly... will have to investigate. I would also ask if the same > > applies to the PNP0B0x devices -- all we really need there is the > > presence/absence indication and the I/O port base. > > It's worth noting that efi_late_init() exists solely because the ACPI > infrastructure to find the BGRT table isn't available any earlier. > > If we could setup ACPI earlier that would be awesome. I'm not sure 100%, but I *think* we need to do that with interrupts enabled. At least after mm_init(), because it relies on things initialized there if I remember correctly. >From what I can tell at the moment, it might be possible to move it before efi_enter_virtual_mode() if that would help. Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
