On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Al Stone <al.stone@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 11/22/2013 06:25 AM, Rob Herring wrote: >> >> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 6:41 PM, <al.stone@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> From: Al Stone <al.stone@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> Modified #ifdef so that DMI is not used on ARM platforms which >>> are currently implementing ACPI reduced HW mode. >> >> >> It is really not allowed or is optional? There are various people that >> want DMI tables on ARM. >> >> Rob > > > True. DMI is optional. I see it as orthogonal to > reduced HW mode; I have to hope that when DMI patches > are forthcoming they'll do the right thing here. > > Is there a better way to do this in the #if ? Doing all of these things at compile time seems odd, shouldn't it be handled at runtime? What happens when someone wants to build a kernel that boots both on the reduced hw mode platforms and regular ones? -Olof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
