On 11/22/2013 06:25 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 6:41 PM, <al.stone@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Al Stone <al.stone@xxxxxxxxxx>
Modified #ifdef so that DMI is not used on ARM platforms which
are currently implementing ACPI reduced HW mode.
It is really not allowed or is optional? There are various people that
want DMI tables on ARM.
Rob
True. DMI is optional. I see it as orthogonal to
reduced HW mode; I have to hope that when DMI patches
are forthcoming they'll do the right thing here.
Is there a better way to do this in the #if ?
Signed-off-by: Al Stone <al.stone@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/dmi.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/dmi.h b/include/linux/dmi.h
index f820f0a..a03deb8 100644
--- a/include/linux/dmi.h
+++ b/include/linux/dmi.h
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ struct dmi_device {
void *device_data; /* Type specific data */
};
-#ifdef CONFIG_DMI
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMI) && !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI_REDUCED_HARDWARE)
struct dmi_dev_onboard {
struct dmi_device dev;
--
1.8.3.1
_______________________________________________
linaro-kernel mailing list
linaro-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-kernel
--
ciao,
al
-----------------------------------
Al Stone
Software Engineer
Linaro Enterprise Group
al.stone@xxxxxxxxxx
-----------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
