On Thursday, November 21, 2013 07:22:17 PM Mika Westerberg wrote: > On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 12:05:34PM -0500, Rhyland Klein wrote: > > This seems like a reasonable patch, and likely a good way to go. I don't > > have a AC100 to test this with though, so I can't verify this > > personally. Also, would the paz00 patch become a dependency of this > > patchset? Mika, maybe you can therefore include a patch for paz00 in > > your patchset? > > Sure I can, if everyone is OK with that. No objections from me. Thanks! -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
