On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Mika Westerberg
<mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Convert to the safer gpiod_* family of API functions.
Few comments below.
> --- a/net/rfkill/rfkill-gpio.c
> +++ b/net/rfkill/rfkill-gpio.c
> +static int rfkill_gpio_convert_to_desc(struct platform_device *pdev,
> + struct rfkill_gpio_data *rfkill)
> +{
> + struct rfkill_gpio_platform_data *pdata = pdev->dev.platform_data;
> + int ret = 0;
Unneeded assignment.
> +
> + if (gpio_is_valid(pdata->reset_gpio)) {
> + ret = devm_gpio_request_one(&pdev->dev, pdata->reset_gpio,
> + 0, rfkill->reset_name);
> + if (ret) {
> + pr_warn("%s: failed to get reset gpio.\n", __func__);
> + return ret;
> + }
> + rfkill->reset_gpio = gpio_to_desc(pdata->reset_gpio);
> + }
> +
> + if (gpio_is_valid(pdata->shutdown_gpio)) {
> + ret = devm_gpio_request_one(&pdev->dev, pdata->shutdown_gpio,
> + 0, rfkill->shutdown_name);
> + if (ret) {
> + pr_warn("%s: failed to get shutdown gpio.\n", __func__);
> + return ret;
> + }
> + rfkill->shutdown_gpio = gpio_to_desc(pdata->shutdown_gpio);
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
[]
> + /* Make sure at-least one of the GPIO is defined and that
> + * a name is specified for this instance
> + */
> + if ((!rfkill->reset_gpio && !rfkill->shutdown_gpio) || !rfkill->name) {
> + pr_warn("%s: invalid platform data\n", __func__);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + if (pdata && pdata->gpio_runtime_setup) {
> + ret = pdata->gpio_runtime_setup(pdev);
> if (ret) {
> - pr_warn("%s: failed to get shutdown gpio.\n", __func__);
> + pr_warn("%s: can't set up gpio\n", __func__);
Could you use dev_* family of functions to print messages?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
