On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 06:57:18PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 18:57:18 -0700
> From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "Chen, Gong" <gong.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx,
> linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] ACPI, CPER: Update cper info
> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.6.4-0ubuntu1
>
> On Fri, 2013-10-11 at 17:47 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 11:06:30AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > > > - printk("%s""APEI generic hardware error status\n", pfx);
> > > > + printk("%s""Generic Hardware Error Status\n", pfx);
> > >
> > > Btw, what's the story with printk not using KERN_x levels in this file?
> > > Why are we falling back to default printk levels for all printks here
> > > and shouldn't we rather prioritize them by urgency into, say, KERN_ERR,
> > > KERN_INFO, etc?
> >
> > Ignore that - checkpatch complained about it but I kinda missed that
> > we're handing down the prefix.
>
> I think it'd be better to rename pfx to level
> as that's what printk.h calls them.
>
No. pfx includes log level and prefix string both.
>
>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
