On Fri, 2013-10-11 at 17:47 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 11:06:30AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > > - printk("%s""APEI generic hardware error status\n", pfx);
> > > + printk("%s""Generic Hardware Error Status\n", pfx);
> >
> > Btw, what's the story with printk not using KERN_x levels in this file?
> > Why are we falling back to default printk levels for all printks here
> > and shouldn't we rather prioritize them by urgency into, say, KERN_ERR,
> > KERN_INFO, etc?
>
> Ignore that - checkpatch complained about it but I kinda missed that
> we're handing down the prefix.
I think it'd be better to rename pfx to level
as that's what printk.h calls them.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
