On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 11:58 PM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 6:42 PM, Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 4:00 AM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Mika Westerberg >>> <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>>> It makes more sense to have these functions close to each other. No >>>> functional changes. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> So I've applied this first patch, and I'm just waiting for Alexandre's >>> ACK on the remaining patches concerning gpiod so we get this >>> 100% right. >> >> I think I'm ok with Mika's patches, however I need to send you a new >> version of gpiod. I wanted to finish documentation first, but maybe >> that can come slightly after so you can at least go ahead with both >> series? > > The important thing right now is to get it in a testable form I think? > So that I can throw it at the autobuilder and it gets included into > linux-next as that comes back online. > > So give me whatever you have ... BTW is this series dependent on > yours to go in first? Sorry for not seeing the details here... Yes it is. I have sent you the v2 of my series last Friday (+ one fix to squash into 3/3). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
