On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 08:58:05AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 6:42 PM, Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 4:00 AM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Mika Westerberg > >> <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >>> It makes more sense to have these functions close to each other. No > >>> functional changes. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> So I've applied this first patch, and I'm just waiting for Alexandre's > >> ACK on the remaining patches concerning gpiod so we get this > >> 100% right. > > > > I think I'm ok with Mika's patches, however I need to send you a new > > version of gpiod. I wanted to finish documentation first, but maybe > > that can come slightly after so you can at least go ahead with both > > series? > > The important thing right now is to get it in a testable form I think? > So that I can throw it at the autobuilder and it gets included into > linux-next as that comes back online. > > So give me whatever you have ... BTW is this series dependent on > yours to go in first? Sorry for not seeing the details here... Correct, this series depends on Alexandre's patches. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
