On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 03:51:05PM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote: >> On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 03:40:42PM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote: >> > >> >> In case you didn't hear, the plan was to add an entry if a user >> >> reports the backlight not working correctly, and acpi_osi="!Windows >> >> 2012" fixing it with no negative effects. and that's what users did in >> >> bug #60682. >> > >> > So add that to each entry you're adding to the list. >> >> No. These entries are already there, I'm merely updating it. I added a >> comment before the list, but the comment was removed. > > There's no point in having a comment that describes a list, because > someone will inevitably reorder them or insert things in between at some > point. Add a comment per entry. >From acpi_osi_dmi_table: /* * BIOS invocation of _OSI(Linux) is almost always a BIOS bug. * Linux ignores it, except for the machines enumerated below. */ -- Felipe Contreras -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
